Shakespeare in Styriadirected by Nicholas Allen and Roberta Brown The play opens with two tribunes discovering the commoners of Rome celebrating Julius Caesar 's triumphant return from defeating the sons of his military rival, Pompey.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Alexander was a Greek king and a military commander of one of the most successful armies in the world during the ancient times.
Likewise, Julius Caesar was a military leader and at the helm in the founding of the Roman Empire. These two great men sought to rule and conquer the world, and they almost did, though using different tactics.
Their leadership styles were different. An analysis of Alexander achievements and deeds indicates that he espoused democracy and admonished to the totalitarianism.
Julius Caesar conquered and spread the influence of the Roman Empire as well as its civilization deep into Europe to a point that almost all the future leaders were to be named after him.
Caesar was born into a traditional influential and respected family. It is this influence that he used to mount his way to the top of the Roman leadership. His exploits in warfare and military conquests are legendary although he had at first concentrated in pursuing political endeavors Thomas, Carol G, He won the first elections in his political career at the early forties.
He was elected into the consul, an influential post at the time. He possessed both charisma and leadership tactics that would see him enjoy a fanatical following. His first deed upon the entry into the counsel was to initiate efforts to curtail the influence and the powers of the democratic government and the senate.
His election into the consul was however not without controversy. There were allegations of bribing and collusion between the parties involved to see Caesar being elected into the senior most magistry post in Rome. Julius was so cunning and after the amassment of power and wealth.
In pursuit of that he joined forces with other two wealthy and very influential individuals in the empire to form what came to be known as the First Triumvirate.
This is further seen in his personal choices of the family he married into or to those he gave his hand to.
He married off his daughter to Pompey, a member of the First Triumvirate, thus sealing the informal association. The members of the first triumvirate had taken control of the various portions of the state.
He was rather forceful in his pronouncements and legislations in his bid to distribute the vast tracts of land to the needy, he went further as to intimidate the opponents through the use of military if need arose.
His dictatorial traits are further seen in the way that he extended his territory and consequently extending his term in office as a consul, contrary to the legislations. Although Caesar enjoyed a fanatical following, Alexander was more deified and revered more for his good deeds than for his immense weaknesses.
He was a great orator and his speeches were driven by the hope for good governance and the spread of western civilization. In his greatest speech ever as addressed to both the Greeks and the Asians, he meant to pave way for a new dawn, after a period of war.
It was the basis of international organization and attack on the belief that some people could be more preferred than others.
This great speech emphasized on equality especially between the Greek and other races. This was in his bid to quell the fears that the Greek would dominate the huge territories that he had conquered. Like his counterpart in history, Julius Caesar, possessing unmatched military prowess, had acquired vast territories spreading his influence even further into Asia.
Just like Caesar after him, Alexander the great was also born into an influential family. His father family was a Greek leader who had made huge contributions in uniting the Greek cities and regions into a nation. He is said to have had great influence into moulding Alexander who himself was a military leader at the age of eighteen years.
Alexander fought many wars, most of which he won big states and kings and leadership were slayed by his army but he did not wish to conquer them by force. As some historians and philosophers say, he was focusing on winning their hearts rather than to over power them, and winning them he did.
Rather than setting up dictatorial and autocratic regimes on those that the defeated, he sought to incorporate and integrate them into his rule.
For example, he conquered Persia and urged his soldiers to intermarry with the locals to integrate both communities into one. To him power and influence were not important, unity was Fildes, Alan, He urged for unity and brotherhood driven by the pursuit of the same culture without necessarily lording it over the people he conquered.
This is a major difference between him and Julius Caesar who would be seen to extend his influence and power to his subjects using all manner of machinizations Woolf Greg, There is more than unanimity among scholars that Alexander in all his ambitions was more concerned with civilizing the world more than with conquering it.
This explains why he was always at a good rapport with those that he defeated. He believed in the unity of the people and legitimacy of a leadership or king as emanating from a good relationship one holds with the subjects.
He would punish those that mistreated his subjects but reward accordingly; those that he thought were fairly mistreating the people.Difference Between Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great Essay Sample. Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar are two very important and influential men in the history of the world.
Alexander was a Greek king and a military commander of one of the most successful armies in the world during the ancient times.
[tags: Alexander the Great Essays] Better Essays words (2 pages) Alexander The Great Essay - Alexander the Great On July twentieth, B.C. Alexander the Great was born. His Father was Philip, the King of Macedonia. - Alexander the Great and Augustus Caesar have proven to be two of the worlds best leaders.
These men were . The Tragedy of Julius Caesar (First Folio title: The Tragedie of Iulius Cæsar) is a history play and tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written in It is one of several plays written by Shakespeare based on true events from Roman history, which also include Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra..
Although the play is named Julius Caesar, Brutus speaks more than four times. A Comparison of Plutarch's The Lives of the Ancient Grecians and Romans and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar When closely evaluating the two texts: Plutarch's The Lives of the Ancient Grecians and Romans and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, there are stark differences of the theme and characters.
A Comparison of Plutarch's The Lives of the Ancient Grecians and Romans and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Words 3 Pages When closely evaluating the two texts: Plutarch's The Lives of the Ancient Grecians and Romans and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, there are stark differences of the theme and characters.
Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar set the standard of what a leader should be. However, despite the two leader’s great accomplishments, Alexander the Great is a better leader. Julius Caesar fit the components of being a good leader: an ability to make a good appearance, and an ability to speak well at public gatherings.